Difference between revisions of "Valuescience Other Resources"

From Valuescience
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*Schrom, David. (2008). ''Valuescience Booklet.'' [http://www.valuescience.org/wiki/images/6/68/ValueScienceBklet.pdf] 24 pp.
 
*Schrom, David. (2008). ''Valuescience Booklet.'' [http://www.valuescience.org/wiki/images/6/68/ValueScienceBklet.pdf] 24 pp.
 
Schrom outlines a basic valuescience argument and briefly touches upon applications to selected fields.  
 
Schrom outlines a basic valuescience argument and briefly touches upon applications to selected fields.  
*Wikipedia. (2009). "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs Link] 8 pp.
 
Maslow proposes a schema, widely referenced for more than half a century, characterizing what he discovered to be universal human wants.
 
  
 
'''Interest Readings'''
 
'''Interest Readings'''

Revision as of 10:34, 30 March 2017

Core Readings

  • Schrom, David. "Evolving Science, Evolving Value." Link 1 page.

Schrom makes a succinct argument for valuescience. Please read to become able to recreate this argument.

  • Schrom, David. (2008). Valuescience Booklet. [1] 24 pp.

Schrom outlines a basic valuescience argument and briefly touches upon applications to selected fields.

Interest Readings

  • Walker, Marshall. (1963). "A Survival Technique." Nature of Scientific Thought. pp.14-20. Link

Walker demystifies science and shows both its ubiquity and its import.

  • Graham, Paul. (2007). "How to Do Philosophy." Link

Y-combinator technology venture incubator founder Graham offers advice and encouragement to budding valuescientists and roots it in his own experience majoring in philosophy for most of his college career.

  • Harris, Sam. (2007). "We Are Making Moral Progress." Link

Harris, a vehement advocate for a scientific approach to morality, makes his case that others are adopting valuescience to good effect.

Max Neff built on Maslow's work to create a more detailed list of universal human needs. He emphasized that these needs were few and finite in contrast to conventional economists who view them as infinite.