Difference between revisions of "Human Ecology Questions"

From Valuescience
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "What framework constitutes a basis for valuescience practice and how can we use that framework to assess the import of practicing valuescience? (120 words) 1. In this course...")
 
(Added Category)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
What framework constitutes a basis for valuescience practice and how can we use that framework to assess the import of practicing valuescience? (120 words)  
+
What framework constitutes a basis for valuesciencing and how can we use that framework to assess the import of valuesciencing? (120 words)  
1. In this course what do we mean and understand by “ecology”?
+
* 1. In this course what do we mean and understand by “ecology”?
2. How in this course have we explained what Lewis Mumford meant when fifty years ago he wrote, “Henceforth all thinking worthy of the name must be ecological”?
+
* 2. How in this course have we explained what Lewis Mumford meant when fifty years ago he wrote, “Henceforth all thinking worthy of the name must be ecological”?
3. What do we mean and understand by “human ecology”?
+
* 3. What do we mean and understand by “human ecology”?
4. Sketch a framework for analysis using human ecology.
+
* 4. Sketch a framework for analysis using human ecology.
5. What overarching basis for value is evident in this framework?
+
* 5. What overarching basis for value is evident in this framework?
6. In valuescience what do we mean and understand by “culture”?
+
* 6. In valuescience what do we mean and understand by “culture”?
7. What benefits may we reap by defining “culture” as we do in valuescience?
+
* 7. What benefits may we reap by defining “culture” as we do in valuescience?
8. How might we argue that culture is a singularly important factor in human ecology?
+
* 8. How might we argue that culture is a singularly important factor in human ecology?
9. How may we use science to assess cultural information?
+
* 9. How may we use science to assess cultural information?
10. How may we support a claim that valuescience is meta-value?
+
* 10. How may we support a claim that valuescience is meta-value?
 +
 
 +
[[Category: Course]]

Latest revision as of 09:09, 8 August 2018

What framework constitutes a basis for valuesciencing and how can we use that framework to assess the import of valuesciencing? (120 words)

  • 1. In this course what do we mean and understand by “ecology”?
  • 2. How in this course have we explained what Lewis Mumford meant when fifty years ago he wrote, “Henceforth all thinking worthy of the name must be ecological”?
  • 3. What do we mean and understand by “human ecology”?
  • 4. Sketch a framework for analysis using human ecology.
  • 5. What overarching basis for value is evident in this framework?
  • 6. In valuescience what do we mean and understand by “culture”?
  • 7. What benefits may we reap by defining “culture” as we do in valuescience?
  • 8. How might we argue that culture is a singularly important factor in human ecology?
  • 9. How may we use science to assess cultural information?
  • 10. How may we support a claim that valuescience is meta-value?