Difference between revisions of "Religion and Economics Questions"
From Valuescience
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | How might we make economics and religion more consilient with science-based | + | How might we make economics and religion more consilient with science-based worldview? (<300 words) |
* 1. Define biophysical economics. | * 1. Define biophysical economics. | ||
* 2. Define externality. | * 2. Define externality. | ||
Revision as of 13:39, 2 July 2018
How might we make economics and religion more consilient with science-based worldview? (<300 words)
- 1. Define biophysical economics.
- 2. Define externality.
- 3. What effect upon stated profit do people in enterprise achieve by externalizing costs?
- 4. According to biophysical economists, what is the current general quantitative relationship between externalities and profits?
- 5. Give one or more reasons you think people are reviving biophysical economics now after ignoring it for so long.
- 6. What are two or more interests some people aim to further by resisting a shift to biophysical economics?
- 7. Whose ideas about value, weighted in what way, are reflected in market prices?
- 8. What is a central theoretical challenge of biophysical economics?
- 9. Define: wealth, income, incomism, capital, capitalism, communism as we have in this course.
- 10. Define relig and delig as we do in this course.
- 11. What are three perils of persisting in religing based upon anything but science?
- 12. Name three potential benefits of evolving religing to be more thoroughly grounded upon science.
- 13. In what ways do you think you can contribute to evolving economics and religion to be more consilient with a science-based world-view?
